March madness is one of my favorite events of the year.  As a Big Ten alumni I always hope that my school will make it to the finals and I follow the games closely.  It is also fun to see how these games drive social conversations online.  Between rabid sports fans and passionate alumni, these games create lots of excitement and discussions!

While I have my personal favorites (hint: Michigan and Indiana), we used Visible Intelligence to take a look back at the second round leading to the Sweet Sixteen. We know who won in our basketball brackets, but what about the Twitter tournament? Who was mentioned most and who won the the social hearts and minds of basketball fans?

As you can see in the infographic below, created with ExactTarget, there were winners, losers, cinderella stories and underdogs.

Highlights:

  • In the top two regions, Oregon and Michigan (Go Blue!) are always among the top schools when it comes to social media in college sports
  • Duke and North Carolina are huge rivals with huge fanbases, so it’s no surprise that these two schools are popular on Twitter
  • In the bottom half of the bracket, Gonzaga (the ultimate Cinderella and often fan-favorite) had the most mentions in the west region
  • Marquette (who won on a buzzer-beater) had the most mentions overall

What happens on the court may not always reflect who wins on Twitter.  Teams with large fan bases and active social media accounts did well. Games with high drama and exciting finishes had more mentions. Bring on the Sweet Sixteen and Elite Eight!

March Madness Round 2 Twitter winners

March Madness Round 2 Twitter winners

That is exactly the question we asked ourselves when we looked at Social Media Engagement. As we watched our clients extend and expand their use of social media teams within their channels and across markets, we increasingly wondered “how can we make engagement more flexible to the way social media leaders want to work?”

Rather than mandate a prescribed definition of constructs as simple as an Inbox, or how posts should be “assigned to” a user, we believe that our clients required a better way to integrate social engagement as a component of their overall business practices.

Our solution: Personalized Engagement.

As of today, in Visible Intelligence, our customers can design their own engagement experience, addressing the posts and conversations that matter to them. The concept is actually quite simple: define your own views – including any number and types of queues, apply a definition for routing posts, apply a visual representation that will be meaningful to users, then assign (or reassign) ownership. With this approach, I can still have an Inbox. I simply define what goes into it, what it looks like, and who can access it.

This personalized engagement approach enables your social media teams to create an experience that balances the growing volume of direct and indirect mentions, priority (based on your definition of meaningful sentiment or topics, and across channels), and the skills of the available resources (i.e. who should engage with which type of posts). Ultimately, it resembles how you want to address engagement. Example views can be wide ranging such as the following:

engagement

It’s easy to craft an experience that fits how your team thinks about engagement and the types of queues that must be supported. Users will see only the queues that they are assigned or share with others, and metrics accurately reflect time to respond and throughput regardless of which queue(s) the posts are funneled through. It’s also easy to create supervisor dashboards which display the current workload balances, queue volumes and sentiment, and engagement metrics such as “time to respond” and status designations.

Beyond personalized engagement, the March release also includes important productivity features that deliver business impact to our clients:

  • Enhanced Reporting
  • Facebook and Twitter channel analytics
  • Single Sign-on (SSO) capabilities

To dig into all the details and how they can help your business, click here!

Interested in learning more about Visible or trying it out for yourself? Sign up for your free trial!

Answering the basic “why’s” and “what’s” in social media can take a variety of approaches. What has worked successfully in a past situation might not provide the same insights in the future, and the overall process can be overwhelming at first.

I should know. As the newest member of the Visible Technologies Insights Team, I had the opportunity of familiarizing myself with the power and versatility of the Visible Intelligence platform by examining one of my personal passions: video games.

On February 20th, Sony held a press conference in New York City to formally announce its newest gaming console, the PlayStation 4. It’s predictable that an event such as this, webcast over dozens of websites would generate an increase in discussion related to Sony and the PlayStation brand. But how great was this increase? Let’s look at some recent data spanning mid-January to mid-February.

Sony Playstation

Read more…

This is a guest post by Jana Fung, Marketing Manager of MixRank.com

Previously,  we looked at the pros and cons of social ad formats for Facebook. Today, we continue with Twitter.

Promoted Tweet

PromotedTweet

  • Pro: Your tweet will reach tens of thousands of Twitter users in days, rather than just the few hundreds or thousands of followers you currently have.  Additionally, you only pay per engagement (re-tweet, favorite, click, or replies, rather than paying by impression.
  • Con: Twitter Advertising is only viewable on Twitter properties.  So you’re missing out on reaching the hundreds of thousands of people who use other vendors like Visible to monitor and post tweets.
  • Recommendation: You’ll have to evaluate if the Twitter audience is your target market. Have you had previous success from acquiring new customers with the tweets you’ve been publishing? If not, then this may not be the best ad format for you. And since there is no option to only pay per click on a Promoted Tweet, you’re automatically opted in to paying for replies, re-tweets and favorites, and those actions are not directly correlated to ROI, but rather a branding campaign. Read more…

This is a guest post by Jana Fung, Marketing Manager of MixRank.com

As new digital ad formats surface in the industry, advertisers with limited budgets must optimize their budget by investing in the right campaigns for their market.  Social ads alone already have a handful of ad formats that can be tested out, but can they be optimized? How much budget should you invest in Facebook vs. Twitter ads? Which Facebook ad format would work best for your business? Maybe a sponsored story, a pay-per-click (PPC) ad, or a sponsored search result.  Another possibility is running an ad through the Facebook Ad Exchange. Read more…

I Only Watch It for the Ads

Previously, we looked at how people really felt about the Superbowl and what the top social stats for the game were. Now we dive into the money behind it all: the advertisements.

Everyone knows someone, or even a few people, who say “I only watch the Super Bowl for the ads”.  Two percent of all social media posts about the Super Bowl were people saying that they only watch for the commercials – were you one of them?

Well, if you are one of the thousands that tune in for the commercials, you are in good and very social company – this year roughly 11% of all social media conversations made during the Super Bowl were about the ads.  One commentator even called this “the most democratic” Super Bowl, referring to the many advertisers offering the social public the chance to participate in contests and polls to decide the outcome of their campaigns and the ability to share in the unique hashtags created to build community around Clydesdales, kisses, cars and more. Read more…

It’s safe to say that the power outage in the third quarter of Super Bowl 47 was one of the most talked about moments of the entire game.  In fact, it’s still a popular topic of conversation among sports radio talk show hosts and fans across the country even on Tuesday morning.

The Super Bowl generates a lot of buzz by itself (obviously), and as this chart shows, the halftime show and the events of the third quarter contributed significantly to that.  In fact, the power outage took on a life of its own, and actually outpaced general mentions of the halftime show just after 5pm (pacific) on Sunday.

Click to enlarge! Read more…

Super Bowl 2013 is estimated to be the most watched program in US TV history. Add a power outage, a close game, some good (and not so good ads), and of course Beyonce performing at half time and it was more than enough to get the social channels buzzing. We were excited to track social media conversations related to the Social Super Bowl once again.

This year we worked with our partner ExactTarget to create an infographic about the Super Bowl Social Media Experience.  ExactTarget is the leading global provider of cross-channel interactive marketing SaaS solutions across email, mobile, social, and websites.

Here is a quick synopsis about this year’s Social Super Bowl.  Stay tuned for some additional analysis about the game and the commercials. Read more…

Try the only enterprise-ready social media monitoring, analytics and engagement platform.